The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) is the governing body of the U.S. central banking system, charged with formulating monetary policy, overseeing the Federal Reserve Banks, and regulating the U.S. banking system. It has a critical supervisory role over bank holding companies and certain depository institutions, including responsibilities for ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requirements.

Definition Of FRB And Supervisory Authority

In its core capacity, the FRB (also referred to as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) sets national policy and regulatory standards for U.S. banking. Under its supervisory remit, the FRB issues regulations and guidance, delegates examinations to Reserve Banks, and enforces compliance among the institutions it supervises.

When it comes to AML controls, the FRB oversees how bank holding companies (and their banking subsidiaries) design and execute their AML/BSA programs, reviews the adequacy of compliance frameworks, and ensures that suspicious activity reporting, sanctions screening, and transaction monitoring systems satisfy regulatory expectations.

Why The FRB Matters In AML Compliance

Even though the FRB does not itself file suspicious activity reports (SARs) or conduct customer onboarding, its supervisory influence is essential to shaping the AML landscape in U.S. banking.

• Standard-setting and guidance: The FRB issues interpretive letters, supervisory guidance, and participates in interagency statements (e.g. SR 23-11 covering BSA/AML) that establish expectations for AML program structure, risk assessments, testing, internal audit, and independent review.

• Examination and enforcement: The FRB, via its Reserve Bank examiners, assesses institutions’ compliance with AML and related statutory BSA obligations. Deficiencies uncovered in AML controls can lead to enforcement actions, increased capital expectations, or supervisory interventions.

• Consolidated supervision: Because many large U.S. banks operate as part of holding‐company groups, the FRB supervises them on a consolidated basis, which allows it to evaluate risks and exposures across subsidiaries, including nonbank units.

• Risk-based scaling: The FRB tailors its supervisory intensity by institution size and complexity. For very large or systemically important bank holding companies, oversight is more rigorous.

• Regulatory coordination: The FRB works alongside agencies like the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), FinCEN, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to align AML/BSA supervision across U.S. financial institutions.

FRB’s Supervisory Program For Bank Holding Companies

Below are some key elements of how the FRB supervises bank holding companies’ AML compliance.

Structure And Consolidated Examination

The FRB’s Bank Holding Company Supervision Manual guides examiners in inspecting holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries. The FRB examines the full organizational structure, inter-affiliate transactions, and control and governance across the consolidated group.

Integration With BSA/AML Guidance

The FRB uses BSA/AML examination manuals aligned with the FFIEC’s BSA/AML Examination Manual to evaluate the adequacy of institutions’ AML programs, including risk assessments, monitoring, transaction filtering, and internal audit.

Frequency And Scope Of Inspection

The intensity of FRB supervision is determined by size, risk, and systemic importance. Large or complex organizations are subject to more frequent, deeper inspections. The FRB recently proposed adjustments to its supervisory rating framework for large bank holding companies to better reflect control and governance strength.

Limitations & Interplay With Other Entities

While the FRB has broad oversight, there are important boundaries and collaborations in its AML supervision:

• No direct BSA obligation for holding companies: Under U.S. rules, a standalone bank holding company or savings & loan holding company may not always be required to maintain a separate BSA/AML program, unless it engages in activities rendering it subject.

• Subsidiary banks are primary nodes: The AML/BSA compliance burden generally lies with banks and other direct banking affiliates, which must file reports, maintain watchlists, and operate transaction monitoring, supervised under FRB guidance.

• Overlap with other regulators: For banks chartered federally, the OCC is the primary regulator; for insured state banks not in the Fed system, the FDIC or state regulators may take precedence. The FRB works in coordination or reaches through the holding company structure.

• Interagency setting: Many AML rules stem from treasury/FinCEN statute. The FRB enforces compliance through supervision but does not itself issue BSA statutes.

The Future Of FRB’s Role In AML Oversight

Looking ahead, several trends could shape how the FRB’s supervisory role evolves:

• Greater emphasis on control frameworks and governance: As seen in proposals to refine the supervisory rating framework, the FRB is pushing to better evaluate governance, controls, and culture, critical to AML effectiveness.

• Use of advanced analytics and data: Expect increased scrutiny over how institutions use AI, machine learning, and real-time monitoring to detect financial crime, and how the FRB assesses those systems.

• Cross-border and groupwide risk focus: For global banking groups, the FRB is likely to press more on foreign operations, cross-jurisdictional money flows, and consistency in AML across the corporate group.

• Regulatory modernization: The FRB may update supervisory manuals and frameworks to reflect evolving threats, including crypto, digital assets, and emerging money-laundering techniques.

• Stronger interagency alignment: As AML regulation becomes more integrated globally, the FRB is likely to deepen coordination with FinCEN, OFAC, and international bodies to maintain consistent expectations.

Strengthen Your FRB-Aligned AML Compliance Framework

Given the FRB’s influential role in shaping AML expectations and supervising bank holding companies, institutions must align their compliance frameworks with supervisory priorities. Proactively incorporating robust governance, deep risk assessment, strong monitoring systems, and responsive remediation will reduce exposure to regulatory enforcement.

Contact Us Today To Strengthen Your AML Compliance Framework