The Sectoral Sanctions Identifications (SSI) List is published by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). It identifies persons and entities operating in specific sectors of the Russian economy, such as finance, energy, and defence, that are subject to targeted restrictions.
SSI lists do not impose full blocking sanctions like the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List. Instead, they restrict specific categories of transactions, such as financing or new debt issuance beyond certain maturity thresholds.
For financial institutions, compliance with the SSI List is critical because violations can result in significant civil penalties and exclusion from U.S. financial markets.
Sectoral Sanctions Identifications (SSI)
The SSI List was first issued under Executive Order 13662 in 2014. It restricts U.S. persons from engaging in certain types of dealings with entities in sectors deemed to contribute to destabilizing activities.
OFAC states that sectoral sanctions under the SSI List apply only to the restricted activities described in the relevant Directives. For example, Directives 1, 2, and 3 restrict U.S. persons from dealing in new debt of specified tenors or issuing new equity (for certain sectors) but do not prohibit all transactions involving SSI entities.
Why The SSI List Matters For Compliance
The SSI List matters because it adds complexity to sanctions screening. Unlike traditional blocking sanctions, SSI restrictions are nuanced, requiring institutions to tailor compliance systems.
Nuanced Restrictions: Prohibit certain financing or long-term debt but allow other transactions.
Dynamic Updates: OFAC regularly adds or amends entities on the list.
Cross-Border Impact: Non-U.S. institutions must also comply to avoid secondary sanctions.
The FATF advises that targeted financial sanctions, including sectoral measures, must be embedded into monitoring frameworks to prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing, as described in FATF Recommendations.
Key Compliance Challenges With SSI Lists
Institutions face several challenges:
Transaction Monitoring: Screening must differentiate between permissible and prohibited transactions.
Ownership and Control Rules: OFAC’s “50 Percent Rule” extends restrictions to entities owned 50% or more by listed parties.
Data Accuracy: Misinterpreting directive scope can lead to over-blocking or missed violations.
Effective compliance depends on integrating SSI directives into tools like Watchlist Management and Payment Screening.
Regulatory Expectations For SSI Lists
Regulators expect firms to implement compliance systems that can capture SSI nuances:
OFAC explains that sectoral sanctions apply to specific categories of transactions, and that institutions must tailor their controls accordingly.
The U.S. Treasury notes that violations of OFAC sanctions programs, civil or criminal, can result in substantial fines, even when non-wilful.
The Future Of SSI Lists In AML Compliance
The SSI framework is likely to expand as geopolitical tensions evolve. Future sanctions may broaden sectoral restrictions beyond Russia, targeting industries linked to cybersecurity, advanced technology, or environmental crime.
Institutions must prepare for more complex screening requirements, where SSI-style restrictions become a model for targeted sanctions worldwide.
Strengthen Your AML Compliance With SSI List Integration
Properly integrating SSI List restrictions into your compliance framework reduces risk of regulatory penalties and ensures smooth global operations.
Contact Us Today To Strengthen Your AML Compliance Framework
