Correspondent banking is the practice where one financial institution provides services on behalf of another, often across borders. It plays a vital role in enabling global payments, foreign exchange transactions, and trade finance. However, it is also one of the highest-risk areas for money laundering and financial crime, which makes it a central focus of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.
Correspondent Banking
In simple terms, correspondent banking involves a relationship between two banks: the correspondent bank, which provides services, and the respondent bank, which receives them. This setup allows smaller or regional banks to access international markets and currencies through larger, globally connected institutions.
For example, a regional bank in one country may not have direct access to U.S. dollars. By partnering with a correspondent bank in the United States, it can offer dollar-denominated services to its clients. This arrangement is essential for cross-border commerce, but it also exposes financial institutions to risks if respondent banks lack strong AML controls.
Why Correspondent Banking Matters In AML Compliance
Correspondent banking is widely recognized as a high-risk activity in AML compliance. Because transactions often involve multiple jurisdictions, regulators have highlighted the vulnerabilities of correspondent relationships to illicit finance.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) notes that criminals exploit weak respondent banks to gain access to the international financial system, making correspondent banking a key channel for money laundering and terrorist financing. Enhanced due diligence is therefore required, with banks obliged to assess the risk profile, compliance framework, and beneficial ownership of their partners.
Institutions typically integrate tools such as Customer Screening and Payment Screening into their compliance workflows to mitigate these risks.
Key AML Risks In Correspondent Banking
The risks in correspondent banking are well-documented, and regulators around the world require proactive mitigation.
These risks include:
Nested Accounts: Where a respondent bank allows other institutions to use its correspondent account without disclosure, increasing opacity.
Jurisdictional Risk: When the respondent operates in high-risk countries with weak AML enforcement.
Lack Of Transparency: Limited visibility into the originators and beneficiaries of transactions.
Sanctions Exposure: Higher potential for sanctions breaches if screening processes are inadequate.
Correspondent relationships that do not apply sufficient due diligence create systemic vulnerabilities. To address this, many institutions implement solutions like Watchlist Management and Transaction Monitoring to ensure continuous oversight.
Regulatory Expectations For Correspondent Banking
International regulators impose strict requirements on correspondent banking relationships. The FCA and FinCEN have both issued guidance emphasizing enhanced due diligence obligations. These include:
Verifying the respondent bank’s AML policies and procedures.
Understanding the ownership and control structure of the respondent.
Monitoring ongoing transactions for unusual or suspicious activity.
Ensuring no undisclosed third-party usage of accounts.
The FCA’s Financial Crime Guide highlights the importance of governance, monitoring, and senior management oversight in correspondent banking relationships
Similarly, FinCEN’s Section 312 Rule under the USA PATRIOT Act requires enhanced due diligence, ownership transparency, and ongoing monitoring for foreign correspondent accounts.
Failure to comply with these expectations has led to multi-billion-dollar fines for major global banks. Strong governance and robust technology are therefore essential to reduce exposure, a view also reinforced by the FATF’s guidance on correspondent banking.
The Future Of Correspondent Banking In AML
Correspondent banking is evolving under the pressure of regulatory scrutiny, de-risking practices, and technological innovation. Many banks have reduced their number of correspondent relationships to lower exposure. However, this has created financial exclusion in some regions.
Looking forward, technologies such as graph analytics and real-time screening are expected to improve transparency and risk detection in correspondent banking. Regulatory frameworks are also likely to evolve, placing greater emphasis on cross-border data sharing and collaborative compliance.
Strengthen Your Correspondent Banking Compliance Framework
Correspondent banking is essential for global finance, but it carries significant AML risks. Financial institutions must adopt a proactive approach with advanced screening, monitoring, and adjudication to stay compliant.
Contact Us Today To Strengthen Your AML Compliance Framework
